Tiger Mother, Burning Bright
Posted On: 2/1/2012 6:00:00 AM
You Are Here: Home > Rants For All Occasions > Among The Breeders Blog
I was recently introduced to "Battle Hymn Of The Tiger Mother," in which Yale Law professor Amy Chua advocates "the Chinese way" of raising children -- suggesting that Asian-style discipline provides the structure that kids need to succeed, and that lax touchy-feely "Western parents" are ruining their offspring. On first blush, I'm inclined to agree with her -- at least to some degree.
East Versus West
I'm the first to agree that American parenting has become too soft and permissive these days -- most folks are more concerned about nurturing their precious little snowflakes' individuality than helping them become productive, functional members of society. But Tiger Mother sees discipline as more important to successful parenting than freedom of choice. Ms. Chua's daughters were never allowed to go to sleepovers, have playdates, watch TV, or choose their own extracurricular activities. They spent their time studying and learning an instrument -- both grew up to be musical prodigies who excelled academically. Ms. Chua believes that "To get good at anything you have to work, and children on their own never want to work, which is why it is crucial to override their preferences. This often requires fortitude on the part of the parents because the child will resist; things are always hardest at the beginning, which is where Western parents tend to give up."So true! I believe that anything worth having requires a great deal of hard work, and we rarely appreciate that which falls into our lap without any effort on our part. And while I may disagree with some of Tiger Mother's tactics (she once threatened to burn her daughter's favorite stuffed animal if her piano playing didn't improve), there is a soundness to the principle involved. The child who had claimed she "couldn't do it" immediately mastered the piece that had previously defeated ber -- she was so proud of herself and so enjoyed showing off her new-found skills that she played the piece endlessly for a week. Tiger Mother believes that "nothing is fun until you're good at it" -- I'm not sure about that, but almost everything is MORE fun once you hone your abilities. And achieving competence doesn't happen overnight -- it's all about delayed gratification. Ms. Chua's goal is not to try and GIVE her children happiness the way American parents do by buying them gifts and praising them indiscriminately -- but to help them BECOME happy on their own through a sense of accomplishment, which is going to require bit of misery while they develop their strengths. Certainly a laudable goal in the abstract.
There's another anecdote from the book that American parents love to use to criticize Tiger Mother's methods -- at one point she rejects a sloppy, careless, hand-made birthday card from one of her daughters as not being good enough. Ms. Chua tells the child that she can do better and she expects more from her. Mean, you say? But is this any less damaging than the "everything you do is wonderful" American way? Think about it -- we praise children for everything they do, even when it's clear they've put forth a half-assed effort and aren't really trying. And what does that get us but a generation of kids with an entitlement mentality and a sense of disappointment as adults? "Mom rewarded me for doing the bare minimum and bringing home C's on my report card -- so I don't understand why I'm not being promoted and given a raise when I do the same thing at work!" So many American kids hold themselves to ridiculously low standards because their parents didn't expect much from them growing up. But Chinese parents only lavish their progeny with ego-inflating praise when a child truly excels -- believing that it's more effective when it's actually been earned. It makes me wonder if we aren't doing our kids a disservice by accepting mediocrity.
There's Some Truth To What She Says
Certainly, I'm not talking about children with legitimate learning disabilities -- I'm referring to the sense of apathy that has overtaken the next generation, nothing but plain old-fashioned laziness. What ever happened to the idea that anything worth doing is worth doing well? I was taught that if you suck as something (sports or reading or math or playing an instrument), you don't just say, "Oh well" -- you do something about it! You work harder, you take lessons, you get extra help, you push yourself (so it's clearly not just an "East meets West" issue). But times have changed -- nowadays, it's taboo to reward achievement and attempt to improve on poor performance. Coaches give "most valuable player" awards to every child on the team so as not to hurt anyone's feelings -- and when a crappy student flunks a class, mom and dad blame the curriculum or the teacher instead of demanding more effort on the part of their offspring. But in other societies, parents see failure as an opportunity to improve -- they get involved, drilling their children, running through practice exercises, sitting with them through endless hours of flash cards and arithmetic problems and rehearsal. They invest time and energy, a foreign concept to many parents in the U.S. It's no wonder Asian students are kicking American students' collective ass at the university level!I personally believe that the Chinese way shows more faith in a child's ability than the Western way. The Chinese assumption is that children can really do anything they set their minds to -- they see their kids as being strong enough to take a dressing-down in the face of poor performance, to learn a lesson from the situation, and to improve their skills as a result. The Western perspective is to worry about failure hurting the child's ego. Tiger Mother says, "Western parents are concerned about their children's psyches. Chinese parents aren't. They assume strength, not fragility. Western parents worry a lot about their children's self-esteem. But as a parent, one of the worst things you can do for your child's self-esteem is to let them give up. On the flip side, there's nothing better for building confidence than learning you can do something you thought you couldn't." No arguments here! In the end, Tiger Mother believes that Chinese child-rearing is much more honest than the euphemistic style of parenting practiced by most Americans. A Chinese mother whose child has grown unhealthily obese feels free to tell the kid to stop eating so much instead of tip-toeing around issues of self-image. A Chinese mother who believes a child isn't putting forth enough effort in school tells the child to make better grades, instead of simply asking him or her to try harder. And in the end, many Chinese mothers secretly believe that they care more about their kids than Westerners, who seem perfectly content to let their children turn out badly. Really, who am I to argue?
Of course, there are drawbacks to this approach. Making every decision for your children and expecting them to blindly obey is guaranteed to hinder their critical thinking skills and creativity -- I don't picture too many DaVincis coming out of this school of parenting thought. These are also not likely to be the most empathetic and emotionally intelligent kids on the planet. And one might question whether this type of discipline really makes a person happy in the long-run. There's much more to success than academic achievement and professional proficiency -- I'm not sure that the Tiger Mothers of the world are raising particularly well-rounded kids (although neither are children in the U.S., come to think of it). You also have to consider the social cost -- suicide is the second leading cause of death among Asian American women ages 15-24 (with family pressures cited as an important factor). But it's not as if the newest generations of young American adults are filled with excitement and hope about the future -- they're dying more of ennui. As with anything, the trick is finding a middle ground -- but I'm convinced the middle is much closer to the battlefield where Tiger Mother stands than the couch upon which the average American breeder sits on her ass!
Would you like to use this content?
Please click here for reprint guidelines and a copy/paste version of the code.
Read More: breeders - childfree - discipline - education - expectations - family - intelligence - parenting - self-determination - society - values
View Next Entry In This Blog: < Previous Post - Next Post >
View Next Entry In Site: < Previous Post - Next Post >
Content on RamonaCreel.com is © Ramona Creel, all rights reserved.
No text or graphic representations may be copied off this site or used in any form.
Entry into this site constitutes agreement to these terms.
If you notice any problems with this site, please contact our webmaster.






Discuss This Post
by Anoosha on 12/30/2011 10:31:09 AM:
The "Chinese way" of parenting that Amy Chua describes is actually found in a lot of Eastern cultures. I am a product of the "Chinese way" of parenting and when I think about my childhood, the first thing that comes to mind is how much my parents cared about me. If they didn't care about me, they would not have pushed me so hard to do well in school, sports, have good manners, and become a responsible citizen who contributes to her country. Even as an adult, I remember telling my dad about my final grade in a graduate course (96%). He asked me, "How come you only got 96%? You should make 100%." My critical thinking skills are well developed and I do not blindly obey the rules; I make my own and am not afraid to follow them. This is all thanks to my parents.
by Jessica on 12/30/2011 10:33:12 AM:
I think more people should parent like this... It's a shame she took so much slack for the book when it first came out.
by Ramona on 12/30/2011 10:42:31 AM:
not to over generalize, but I think it shows the cultural difference between east and west -- western parents seem to mistake leniency for caring, while eastern parents seem better at challenging their kids to become stronger adults (my own personal preference) -- I'm sure some of it is the national values system, but I also wonder if it has to do with how hard you had to work for what you have -- so many Americans grew up spoiled, handed everything they wanted, never had to work for anything, and were instilled with an entitlement mentality -- but folks from other countries and those in the US who have experienced hard times see power in teaching their kids to earn what they have (my parents were children of the Great Depression, and very much had the attitude that if I want it, I need to work hard for it) -- I'm sure the truth lies somewhere between being your kid's friend and burning her stuffed animal if she missed a note on her scales, but I definitely lean more toward the eastern method!
by Alex on 1/1/2012 8:22:49 PM:
Like everything else, it probably depends on the child. Maybe some kids respond well to this kind of upbringing, but I did not. My parents would force me to do a lot of things I didn't want to do as a child, all in the name of "character building" or "being nice" or whatever the lesson du jour was, and I hated them for it. Frankly, I still do. They never took into consideration my individual needs and my personality. They never trusted me enough to let me decide what my interests and values should be. Naturally, if a child is hurting others or putting themselves in danger, discipline is in order. But beyond the basics (like being polite and doing your homework), why shouldn't a child make these kinds of decisions themselves? Why should my mother have forced me to go to camp or play the violin if I didn't want to, if it only made me miserable? Looking back, I don't see love. I see a desire to squeeze a round peg of a child into the parent's pre-conceived square hole of conformity. If a person will only be happy if their kid has certain interests, or a certain IQ, or whatever, that person should absolutely NEVER become a parent. It's not fair to the child. The child will never be able to discover who they really are, because mommy and daddy decided it for them before they were even born. I'm glad Ms. Chua's children seem to be well-adjusted (though who can really know--appearances are often deceiving), but in my case, this kind of attitude is one of the reasons I barely speak to my parents anymore.
by Ramona on 1/1/2012 9:30:35 PM:
I agree to a point, but I also think there's value in teaching kids that life is sometimes about putting up with things when they don't want to -- there were activities I would have quit as a kid, but my mother MADE me stick with them -- sure, I resented her at the time, told her I was old enough to make up my own mind, and in hindsight realized that she helped make me a better person in the long run -- I believe in paying attention to a kid's interests and values, but the problem is that children are about 99% id with no real logical assessment skills or world experience until someone helps them acquire both -- I think there's a difference between trying to turn your child into what YOU want him or her to be and challenging a kid to go beyond his limits -- we live in such an entitlement society, and I see so many children who have no tenacity or work ethic, but still expect everything to be handed to them on a silver platter, so I tend to lean more toward a little "push" in parenting
by Alex on 1/1/2012 10:49:33 PM:
Ramona--I appreciate your response. Like I said, it depends on the child. Some kids need a firmer hand than others, and part of being a good parent is knowing what kind of kid you have and what they will best respond to. Most parents, in my experience, don't bother to get to know their kids well enough to figure this out. They just assume that whatever worked for them will also work for their kids, when there is really very little reason to believe that. Everyone is different, and kids can be of very different temperaments than their parents regardless of how much DNA they share. (This is the situation I grew up in--I have nothing in common with either of my parents, so most of the assumptions they made about how best to raise me backfired, because they were using their own personalities and limitations, rather than mine, as a benchmark.) I agree that it's important to teach kids that they will not always get their way and that they will have to work for what they want, but each kid will learn this lesson in different ways. It's the parents' job to figure out how to impart the lesson without damaging the child, and that is a tough job, one that many, perhaps most, parents can't pull off. All parents and potential parents should always remember that how you raise your children will have a life-long effect on them, so choose carefully. If you make the wrong choice, it could lead to estrangement. Having a child truly is inviting a stranger to live in your home. A stranger you'll be responsible for. Yet one more reason I'm glad I'm childfree.
by Ramona on 1/2/2012 8:45:17 AM:
So true! If only everyone gave as much thought to the responsibilities of parenting before having a kid, we'd definitely have fewer children running around (and certainly fewer screwed up ones!)
by Rhoda on 1/8/2012 7:04:45 PM:
I read this book about a year ago so it's become slightly foggy in my mind, but I definitely think she had some very good ideas. Due to my decidedly Western upbringing I found some of it too harsh, but I think somewhere in the middle would be ideal. Too many parents expect little to nothing from their children. I see a great example of this by watching some of the teen reality shows. I'm 35 so not exactly old but definitely a different generation...I remember when it was considered really odd & strange for someone to not have a job and/or attend school and to be aiming for moving out of their parents' homes asap. Now it seems like age 23+ it's still considered perfectly ok to be at home, not working, just chillin'. Not ok.